| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Unregistered(d) |
Re: Classics You Did NOT Like? | ||
|
Thanks Alicia, i've been looking for a good board to discuss books for a while, so i'll be sticking around.
|
|||
Unregistered(d) |
Classics You Did NOT Like? | ||
|
Crime and Punishment----eck! Just not my cup 'o tea!
|
|||
Unregistered(d) |
Classics You Did NOT Like? | ||
|
My Gosh! I must have been brain dead in high school or else I totally blocked out ALL classics that were crammed down my throat during summer reading.
There are many that I have not read and am looking forward to reading now. I graduated in 1984 so guess what book we HAD to read? I gagged my way through as much as I could and then got so grossed out I threw the book across the room and vowed NEVER to touch it again. I went into school (Catholic, parochial, all girls) the next day and told the teacher I WAS NOT going to finish the book and to fail me if she wanted. When she realized I was not backing down she left me alone about the rest of the book. |
|||
Gracewings |
Re: Classics You Did NOT Like? | ||
|
I had meant to read that book [1984] for years and years. Finally, I started it a few years ago and could never finish it. the Big Brother stuff was disturbing enough but the violent thoughts in his mind were too much for me.
|
|||
Unregistered(d) |
Classics You Did NOT Like? | ||
|
Moll Flanders was really boring. I actually couldn't finish it.
|
|||
rainbowdragonfly2 |
Classics You Did NOT Like? - Message Board - ezboard.co | ||
|
I'd have to say The Scarlet Letter. I couldn't stand that book. I am also not a fan of Hemingway.
|
|||
Unregistered(d) |
Classics You Did NOT Like? - Message Board - ezboard.com | ||
|
Daniel Defoe's "Robinson Crusoe" struck me as amateurish, repetitive, dull, repetitive, unfeasible, pompous and repetitive.
Did I mention it was repetitive? |
|||
LavendernOldJeans |
Re: Classics You Did NOT Like? - Message Board - ezboard.com | ||
|
I love the fact I have 2 degrees in Lit and never read Moby Dick or Middlemarch. I have tried, but I cannot take George Eliot's glutinous prose in which each word appears to cling to the other in a sticky indigestible mass.
It's not the era! I love many 18th and 19th century novels. Like Charlotte Bronte--cannot stand her sisters who are way too overwrought. Like the Brothers K, cannot stand Crime and Punishment. Like Tolstoy, but on re-reads, sometimes just read alternate chapters in War and Peace. My daughter said essentially I just read Peace. I love Stephen Crane, but not the Red Badge of COurage, which is his worst. They choose it for high school because it is "suitable" for children. One cannot teach Maggie: a Girl of the Streets to 15 yos. I actually do like most of the classics. Context is everything. But i get really bored with the dated "modern" classics. The canon needs to be cleared of things like A Separate Peace. |
|||
Alicia GA |
Re: Classics You Did NOT Like? - Message Board - ezboard.com | ||
Quote: |
|||
LavendernOldJeans |
More horrid classics | ||
|
Although I usually like Edith Wharton well enough, I was tortured by listening to House of Mirth. The title is taken from Ecclesiastes 7:4: "The heart of the wise is in the house of mourning; but the heart of fools is in the house of mirth."
{Warning: Plot spoilers if you ignore me and read this!) The main character, Lily Bart, is one of those wrongheaded fools who behave like moths and candles. And like a moth she darts around and around the flame before actually hitting it. And it seems so very, very contrived. You know when you watch a thriller and the stupid girl decides as a result of a specious phone call or other device to go to the scary place (warehouse, upstairs, the beach, whatever) into the power of the killer (man, spirit, alien, beast) and you want to scream at her? It is so painful to watch! At least she only does it once. Lily Bart is even worse. She's more like that main character in X-Files who persists in sitting or standing before a darkened room even though he always gets hit in the head. One night I was so depressed by this stupid book that DD thought when I came in that I had been fired. I would have just looked up the ending in Magill's but all the sitting room books were in boxes because of the painting. N asked why I didn't stop listening. I said I was committed, and I had to know what happened. When I finished, it was even worse than I expected; the idiot inadvertently kills herself just when everything was going to be okay! She didn't even commit suicide which would have been a viable alternative. We are supposed to think "Society" killed her. I think it was Darwinian forces! So pleased to think she died before breeding. |
|||
LavendernOldJeans |
Re: More horrid classics | ||
|
I really like Henry James, but cannot stand "Turn of the Screw." Like Joyce, but dislike "Exiles" and Finnegan's Wake. Like Hawthorne, but really hate The Scarlet Letter.
I cannot stand Ibsen. Like Camus but hate Sartre and his girlfriend. |
|||
LavendernOldJeans |
Re: More horrid classics | ||
|
Hemingway. Some early stories, maybe 2, before Gertrude Stein became an influence. "Bernice cuts her Hair," I think, are okay. After that, his doubts about his own masculinity and attempts to hide his 3-dollar-bill-ness just pall way too rapidly for me.
When DD was a teen, I had her read The Sun Also Rises (best of a very bad lot) so she could get the point. Then I had her read the masterplots so she could sneer more knowledgeably and get basic references. So much of "American literature" is literature by default. It's like the politically correct need to search for "early examples" of AA, women's, American, whatever, before any real body of literature exists. So they put up stuff because of when it was written and it is just awful. |
|||
Lisa Cambpell |
Re: More horrid classics | ||
|
As much as I love Twain, I couldn't and have never cared for Connecticut Yankee in King Authur's Court and 1984....blech!
|
|||
Nyssa The Hobbit |
Re: More horrid classics | ||
|
Anything by James Joyce, except for "Araby" and "The Dead." There's very little plot. I had to read "Portrait" twice, once for high school, once for college. I could not stand it either time. What's up with that Hellfire sermon taking so many pages? Then in Irish Writer's class, practically all we read was by Joyce. ARGH!
|
|||
Lisa Cambpell |
Re: More horrid classics | ||
|
I have to agree...I have no patience with Joyce. Melville is up there too.
I do admire those that can enjoy their works, however. I am sure they would think me mad for loving Jude the Obscure. |
|||
RHFay |
Re: Classics You Did NOT Like? | ||
|
I'm usually interested in the classics, but I couldn't get through Wuthering Heights. I made my daughter read this one for reading in home school, and I couldn't bring myself to finish it! She struggled painfully through, but she did manage to finish.
I don't mind dark and depressing works, but Heathcliffe was just too miserable. There seemed to be nothing good about that character, which made the whole thing feel like drudgery. |
|||
LavendernOldJeans |
Re: Classics You Did NOT Like? | ||
|
I cannot stand Wuthering Heights. Dark and brooding men get on my nerves, maybe because of Heathcliff? I read it early because my first cousin (now an MD and 6 years older) hated to read and paid me to read them for him!
I do like Hardy. There's a really good and accessible book of litcrit called Reader I Married Him that some of you might like. I do like Joyce's Ulysses but Finnegan's Wake is a pretentious sell. When Joyce was writing it and going blind, Samuel Beckett was serving as his amenuensis. Someone knocked on the door, and Joyce said, "Come in." beckett wrote it down. Later when the ms was being read back to him, and they figured out what had occurred, Joyce said, "Let it stand, I will stoop to collaborate with coincidence." I mean, one grows to detest someone as pretentious as that! |
|||
Spotted Crow |
Re: Classics You Did NOT Like? | ||
|
Great Expectations...my Goddess, I absolutely wished Miss Haversham to bite the dust and I wanted to beat Pip into a pulp.
|
|||
jnol74 |
|||
|
I'm new here and am picking my way through all the great threads! Yowza!
Anyway, hands down the classic I've disliked the most is "Anna Karenina". It bored me to tears! I only read it because I wanted to see what joining in on of Oprah's "picks" would be like and also, to see what made this one a "classic" since the synopsis of it I'd read sounded so completely lame (JMHO, of course). I wound up skimming whole chapters Tolstoy never seemed to know when to conclude!!!!!
|
|||
brandewijn |
|||
|
Absolutely hated Anna Karenina by Tolstoy. Ugh!
|
|||